Thirty Six Common Fallacies Explained

L. Van Warren
Warren Design Vision 

Introduction
If you have taken courses in debate, logic, or political science you may have been exposed to the common fallacies of:
"bandwagon argument",  - everybody is doing it,
"ad hominum", - attack the person instead of the argument,
"endorsment", - the person saying it is famous, therefore it must be true.

If you have been exposed to how magicians work you may be familiar with, sleight, feint, misdirection or deception.

Fallacious systems of reasoning pervade the economic world. "Get Rich Quick", phone card & real estate scams, pyramid schemes, chain letters, the list goes on. Because deceptions based on fallacy are so common, I would like to briefly equip you to recognize fallacious reasoning.

There is no world as vulnerable to fallacy as the religious world.  Because there is no direct measure of whether a given idea is correct, good thinking practices can be replaced by "logical drift".  This is how cults arise.   Any person who chooses to be religious should be aware of their vulnerability to fallacy.

The film, "Roshomon", by the Japanese director Akira Karosawa, is an excellent study in fallacy.


List of fallacies:

1. Black-and-white fallacy.
(a) using sharp distinctions despite any factual support for them.
Example: "He is a Democrat, therefore he must be a pro-choice."
(b) classifying a middle point between extremes as one of the extremes.
Example: "You are either a conservative or a liberal."

2. Fallacy of argument from force (argumentum ad baculum)
Literally "an argument according to the rod", using force to gain acceptance of the argument.

3. Fallacy of argument against the man (argumentum ad hominem)
The Latin means "argument to the man."
(a) Arguing against a person's views by attacking them instead of their argument.
Example: "What John said should not be believed because he has red hair"

4. Fallacy of argument from ignorance (argumentum ad ignorantiam)
The Latin means "argument to ignorance."
(a) Arguing something is true because no one has proved it false
Example: "Aliens exist since no one has proven they don't."
(b) Arguing that something is false because no one has proved it true.
Example: "Aliens don't exist since no one has proven they do."

5. Fallacy of argument to pity (argumentum ad misericordiam).
Arguing by appeal to pity in order to have some point accepted.
Example:  "I've got to have at least a B in this course Professor, if I don't I won't stand a chance for medical school."

6. Fallacy of appeal to personal interest (argumentum ad personam).
Appeal to the personal likes, prejudices, weaknesses, of others in order to have an argument accepted. "Well ya wanna be in the club don't ya?"

7. Fallacy of argument to the people (argumentum ad populum).
Appeal to the gallery, majority, popular prejudice, biases, or mob instinct in order to arouse popular acceptance of an idea without resorting to logical justification of the idea.
Example: The mob scene in Frankenstein.

8. Fallacy of argument to veneration (argumentum ad verecundiam.)
Appealing to authority, fame, customs, traditions, institutions, to gain acceptance of a point.
Example: "That's the way we've always done it..."

9. Fallacy of accent or ambiguity.
Arguing to conclusions from undue accent upon certain words.
Example: "The queen cannot but be praised."

10. Fallacy of accident. (dicto simpliciter ad dictum secundum quid)
(a) Applying a general rule or principle to an instance
not allowing the proper application of that generalization.
Example: "That spotted horse is male, therefore all spotted horses must be male"

11. Fallacy of begging the question.
(a) Arriving at a conclusion from statements that themselves are questionable.
Example: The Cubans wanted Kennedy dead, Oswald was in Cuba, therefore the Cubans hired Oswald.
(b) Assuming the conclusion or part of the conclusion in the premises of an argument, circular reasoning.
Example: "Aristocracy is the best form of government because the best form of government is that which has strong aristocratic leadership."

12. Fallacy of ill-posed or loaded question.
(a) Asking a question wherein a "Yes" or a "No" will incriminate the respondent.
Examples:
"Have you buried all your victims?" or
"Have you stopped beating your wife"
(b) Asking questions that are based on unstated attitudes or questionable assumptions.
Example: "How long are you going to put up with this injustice?"

13. Fallacy of composition.
(a) Arguing that what is true of the parts is also true of the whole.
Example: "Molecules wiggle, therefore people fidget."

14. Fallacy of division.
Arguing that what is true of the whole is true of its parts.
Example: "People breathe, therefore molecules breathe."

15. Fallacy of consensus gentium.
Arguing that an idea is true on the basis that the majority of people believe it.
Example: Fen fen is great for weight loss....

16. Fallacy of converse accident (a dicto secumdum quid ad dictum simpliciter). The error of generalizing from atypical or exceptional instances. Example: "Insulin shots makes diabetics well. People in general ought to have insulin shots to feel better."

17. Fallacy of equivocation.
An argument in which a word is used with one meaning in one part of the argument and with another meaning in another part.
Example: "The end of a thing is its perfection, death is the end of life, hence death is the perfection of life."

18. Fallacy of non causa pro causa.
Translated: "there is no cause of the sort that has been given as the cause."
Believing that something is the cause of an effect when in reality it is not. Example: "My little dance causes it to rain."

19. Fallacy of false cause (post hoc ergo propter hoc).
Example: "A black cat ran across my path. Ten minutes later I was hit by a truck. Therefore, the cat's running across my path was the cause of my being hit by a truck."

20. Fallacy of hasty generalization.
An error of reasoning whereby a general statement is asserted with limited information, inadequate evidence, or unrepresentative sampling. 

21. Fallacy of irrelevant conclusion (ignoratio elenchi). An argument that is irrelevant;
Example: A lawyer in defending his alcoholic client who has murdered three people in a drunken spree argues that alcoholism is a  terrible disease and attempts should be made to eliminate it.

22. Fallacy of inconsistency. Arguing from inconsistent statements, or to conclusions that are inconsistent with the premises. See fallacy of tu quoque below.

23. Fallacy of irrelevant purpose. Arguing against something on the basis that it has not fulfilled its purpose (although in fact that was not its intended purpose).

24. Fallacy of 'is' to 'ought.' Arguing from premises that have only  descriptive statements (is) to a conclusion that contains an ought, or a should.

25. Fallacy of limited (or false) alternatives. The error of insisting  without full inquiry or evidence that the alternatives to a course of action have been exhausted and/or are mutually exclusive.

26. Fallacy of misleading context. Arguing by misrepresenting, distorting, omitting or quoting something out of context.

27. Fallacy of red herring. Ignoring criticism of an argument by changing attention to another subject.
Examples: "You believe in abortion, yet you don't believe in the right-to-die-with-dignity bill before the legislature."

28. Fallacy of slanting. Deliberately omitting, de-emphasizing, or overemphasizing certain points to the exclusion of others in order to hide evidence that is important and relevant to the conclusion of the argument and that should be taken into account of in an argument.

29. Fallacy of special pleading.

(a) Accepting an idea or criticism when applied to an opponent's argument but rejecting it when applied to one's own argument.

(b) rejecting an idea or criticism when applied to an opponent's argument but accepting it when applied to one's own.

30. Fallacy of the straw man. Presenting an opponent's position in a weak or misrepresented version so that it can be easily refuted.

31. Fallacy of the beard.
(a) Arguing that small or minor differences do not (or cannot) make a  difference, or are not (or cannot be) significant, or
(b) Arguing so as to find a definite point at which something can be named. For example, insisting that a few hairs lost here and there do not indicate anything about my impending baldness; or trying to determine how many hairs a person must have before he can be called bald (or not bald).

32. Fallacy of tu quoque (you also).
(a) Presenting evidence that a person's actions are not consistent with that for which he is arguing.
Example: "John preaches that we should be kind and loving. He doesn't practice it. I've seen him beat up his kids."
(b) Showing that a person's views are inconsistent with what he previously believed and therefore:
    (1) he is not to be trusted, and/or
    (2) his new view is to be rejected.
Example: The Democrats for years used illegal wiretapping; therefore the Republicans should not be condemned for their use of illegal wiretapping.

33. Gambler's fallacy. (a) Arguing that since, for example, a penny has fallen tails ten times in a row then it will fall heads the eleventh time.

34. Pragmatic fallacy. Arguing that something is true because it has practical effects upon people: it makes them happier, easier to deal  with, more moral, loyal, stable. Example: "An immortal life exists because without such a concept men would have nothing to live for. There would be no meaning or purpose in life and everyone would be immoral."

35. Pathetic or anthropomorphic fallacy. Incorrectly projecting (attributing) human  emotions, feeling, intentions, thoughts, traits upon events or objects which do not possess the capacity for such qualities.

36. Fallacy of ascertainment. Also known as, "finding what you were looking for." Ascertainment error is common in scientific research and reporting. AE comes up when we study a new or old problem, using a new tool or method that sheds more light, or refines the amount of detail available on the situation. When the new tool, or more sensitive detection method is used, we find more of the thing we are looking for, than is recoverable for old data or circumstances. Examples: “vaccination causes autism”.